Support will be removed on both client and server side.

The process of removing OpenVPN from our app starts today and may be completed much earlier.

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except the 5 device limit. With OVPN it means 5 connected devices, with WG it means 5 registered public keys.

      Say you use the official Mullvad app and also setup some 3rd party WG client on your phone. That’s now taking up 2 devices. Or perhaps you do have 6 devices, but you never have more than 2 of them running at once. With WG, that’s still 6 devices regardless of them being connected or not, while with OVPN it will indeed be just 2 devices.

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wireguard is more elegant and performant, and has a smaller attack surface. OpenVPN, meanwhile, is a legacy protocol, and retiring it should be a good thing.

        • Rogue@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          About the same time VPN platforms started migrating away from it

          • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I feel like that’s kind of a case of circular reasoning though: we move away from it because it’s legacy, and it’s legacy because we’re moving away from it… Mind you, I’m no expert on VPNs; this is just something I thought I’d bring to attention here.