This thread was inappropriately censored by either @punkisdead@slrpnk.net or @mambabasa@slrpnk.net claiming:

“Reason: Reason: Literally the opposite of anti-work is “over employment” which OP is arguing for”

There is an English comprehension problem by the mod. Would someone whose first language is English please:

  1. notice that over employment is actually the problem that the thread identifies and seeks remedies for. Being forced into a full-time or nothing ultamatim is a very common problem that oppresses the anti-work community.
  2. undo the improper action

The mod’s action to suppress is actually a pro-work action, as it prevents discussion around solutions to over-employment.

  • activistPnk@slrpnk.netOPEnglish
    0·
    4 days ago

    Can you actually tell us what your post had to do with the abolition of work?

    I’ve posted there in the past about mitigating work (incl. concepts like ”quitting” but working which just means ways to not work your ass off pleasing a boss and just working at a content pace). I posted about new work reduction laws. I never posted about full abolition of work. And I commented then that it was strange that the sidebar seems to only mention full abolition of work, and I asked if there were any objections to chatter about work reduction. There were none. And those other posts were not suppressed. So I figured the sidebar was unintentionally narrow.

    I stand by the decision to remove the post and I think its kinda ridiculous how out of proportion you are blowing this instance of mod action.

    The rationale in the modlog was nonsense. Now you are giving different rationale.