• InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    As I understand it, the protocol has the ability to decentralize built in. But the technical requirements are prohibitively high to the point only large businesses or corps could afford to do it. I also believe (someone correct me) the company hasn’t switched on the functionality yet.

    • Drunemeton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Last heard (a few months ago) the cost is in storage. The protocol isn’t too complicated now, but it generates a shit ton of data, and IIRC you need a minimum of 3 copies.

      • mac@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Storage is cheap whwn it comes to webhosting and 3 replicas is honestly not much when it comes to enterprise standards. I think cloud storage providers like backblaze keep something like 9 copies of data across different mediums

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      The biggest thing is that you need to be manually authorized by them for federation. They will only ever federate with servers that arent serious enough competition to lead to democratization of the overall network.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        No, PDS federation is fully open now.

        They’re also actively supporting development of 3rd party appviews and relays.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          The power dynamic is still 1000000:1 they can do whatever they want and you will have to follow. If they defederate you, there is no value in your self hosted instance.