• pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Migrating all my IPv4 stuff (firewalls, VPN, routing tables, etc) to IPv6 is probably the one thing I’ve procrastinated for the most time in my life :/

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Posted in December of course, after re-enabling IPv4 and restoring their internet connection to a functional state cuz some mystery process didn’t respond all month.

    Edit: I actually can’t even access the link at the moment, maybe they forgot and left some IPv6 task enabled.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The challenge didn’t ask to disable ipv4 but it was (jokingly) daring people to expose all ports to public to see how long the system would last before being exploited by bots. It wasn’t meant to be taken seriously 😆

    • SilverCode@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      How would you disable NAT and still use ipv4 unless you are able to assign a public IPv4 to your PC (and have nothing else in the network)?

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        you connect your PC directly out of the link that the ISP is giving you (if allowed), for example via PPPoE

        • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          A standard DMZ still does NAT. You get a private IP and the router "nat"s you, just that it forwards all incoming traffic to that device by default. I think technically, that gets you disqualified for no nat november. Though, you’d end up exposing the ports of the machine to incoming traffic, that’s correct.