It’s much easier on Windows. When it’s just as is easy if not easier to do on Linux is the day I switch without hesitation. I’m far too setup and comfortable with Windows, I’m a pleb I know but it is what it is.

If you want those mindless online shooter games who slobber all over that absolutely useless anticheat software, then stay on windows honestly.

But i’m currently on Windows and I don’t play those games. What I want is an alternative that I don’t have to jump through hoops and follow a recipe just to boot up games, and have access to modding tools that most if not all are only built for Windows.

Holy shit that’s a lot just to be able to play a game. Is there any hope of Linux becoming more user friendly and streamlined?

There isn’t just mindless online slobber shooters on Windows, y’know. Those same shooters exist on Linux too.

Imagine being Grimes and fucking that guy.

Modded Cyberpunk is kinda my thing right now, would that be a problem on Linux?

I can’t remember specifics but I remember a bunch of games i’ve modded don’t have tools supported on Linux.

Because Elon’s balls are nonexistent. At least he still has the heart and brain, however small and hard of a target they are.

That’s gonna be America pretty soon.

:Alt+Tab out of Wolfenstien: What?

Must’ve been hard for you in the 90’s with Xena Warrior Princess being a DEI gay female superhero.

How does Linux fair with gaming, game dev, and modding? I don’t wanna get on Linux and have to jump through hoops just to get Vortex working for Nexusmods or something.

And what are we gonna do about it?

I’m just wondering why you speak with such casual conclusiveness that smaller population size is even worth mentioning, when all evidence says that population size has little to nothing to do with political trends that lead to authoritarian fascism (being that the subject is NZ not being as right wing as USA). I’m trying to argue the fact that there’s zero anthropological data suggesting that population sizes, even climate environments, have any correlation with certain cultures leaning more in a certain direction. You however seem to think it’s worth bringing up, or that there are “many other things that having a smaller population affects” I just want to know where you get that idea from, again, when all evidence points to the contrary.

Smaller population simply means each person’s vote counts for more.

What about the smaller tribes who live under strict patriarchies that can’t vote? Plenty examples of those in history and today (cults for instance). There are also examples of massive cities with egalitarian urban planning with no centralized temples or food storage. So again I ask, what makes you think population size has anything to do with their politics?

A bigger, louder ‘0’ is still equal to 0, but with more wasted effort to boot. The question is why Berliners still like Naziism enough to leave that building standing is what I wonder when they shine a projector on it for a day and call it anything. I would say they’re doing a lot more to waste effort, energy, optics, and time than being on lemmy.

Cute stunt, nothing will change.

“It’s a much smaller population” literally your second sentence, or do you not comprehend your own writing? Why is their smaller population relevant?

Just because an island has a smaller population doesn’t make it any more or less predisposed to egalitarianism, nor do large populations have to be predisposed to authoritarianism.