lsmu
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ooli@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months ago

Asking some reasonable questions about Elon Musk's "help" with the Cybertruck bombing case

i.redd.it

message-square
81
link
fedilink
0

Asking some reasonable questions about Elon Musk's "help" with the Cybertruck bombing case

i.redd.it

ooli@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months ago
message-square
81
link
fedilink
  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The question is if it was security camera footage from the facility or from the cybertruck itself. One is fine, one clearly is not.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was specifically referring to security cameras. Cameras at the un-manned charging site, recording video only in a public area where there is no expectation of privacy. Any gas station would have the same.

      Now other commenters have pointed out they likely accessed the footage from the truck itself. This is a different ballpark.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The in-car footage of the driver is for insurance reasons. If the Autopilot crashes, the footage will show that the driver was not paying attention or did not have the hands on the wheel, therefore it’s not teslas but the drivers fault.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The in-car footage of the driver is for insurance liability reasons.

        Ftfy

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Here’s your answer. It’s not a new thing.

      https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      it’s the first one (that i know of), however musk also said that telemetry looked normal until it burned, which is not fine in any sensible way

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is not. Unfortunately seems if you don’t like it, your only options are a decade old car or a bike.

        https://electrek.co/2024/12/30/massive-data-leak-at-volkswagen-exposes-800000-ev-drivers/

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That raises a new question. Did they stream the footage from the exploded cybertruck after the fact (i.e. the computer and storage were still fine), or are they endlessly streaming the footage into their own cloud storage so the explosion couldn’t have affected it?

        The latter seems unlikely, because that’s a huge data storage cost. But the more I learn the more I wonder.

Privacy@lemmy.world

privacy@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.world

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 19 users / day
  • 37 users / week
  • 138 users / month
  • 883 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 5.88K subscribers
  • 247 Posts
  • 1.95K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • iopq@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org