Teddy (left), and Sampson (right)

  • WamGams@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just a head’s up but not a single police department in the nation DNA tests or even has a spot on their reports to label which specific breed of dog caused the attack, there is also roughly a dozen different breeds on the list of dogs commonly mistaken for pits.

    Anybody telling you pits are responsible for any percentage of dog attacks is lying by giving a number not scientifically achieved.

    • Cloudless ☼@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      In 2009, the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia released a five-year review of dog-bite injuries. The review states that 51 percent of attacks were made by pit bulls.

      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19644273/

      In 2009, another study was published by the American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. The study ran for 15 years and it has concluded that pit bulls, German Shepherds, and Rottweilers are among the most common breeds that cause fatal dog attacks in Kentucky State.

      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19696575/

      In 2011, the Annals of Surgery published a study, which concluded that Pitbull attacks lead to more expensive hospital bills, higher risk of death, and higher morbidity rates compared to other breeds of dogs.

      https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Abstract/2011/04000/Mortality,_Mauling,_and_Maiming_by_Vicious_Dogs.23.aspx

      • WamGams@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Your data was true 13-15 years ago, doesn’t mean it is true today.

        • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Doesn’t mean it’s wrong either; try to provide something to say otherwise.

          Also how old does data need to be before it’s dismissed as ‘too old’?

          • WamGams@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s up to you.

            What other subjects do you accept almost 20 year old data on? Do you go back 50 years? What is the cut off for you in all subjects, or is pit bulls the only subject you don’t have a standard for?

            • Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              did pitbull behavior change in 20 years. they suddenly became goody good dogs?

              i’d say it’s relevant until today and well into the future.

    • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      there is also roughly a dozen different breeds on the list of dogs commonly mistaken for pits.

      Do you have any evidence to support this statement? It would need to be pretty substantial to offset the large proportion of Pit Bull breeds.

      I dont say this to be dismissive, I would actually be pretty interested in reading what you have.

        • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Just a head’s up but not a single police department in the nation DNA tests or even has a spot on their reports to label which specific breed of dog caused the attack.

          Your link doesn’t address the point you made above, it’s just a list of dogs mistaken for specifically “American pit bull terriers”, it doesn’t mention police DNA tests or reports, it says nothing.

          Besides im talking about Pit Bulls in general which (Per the statement I made previously to another commenter on this post) is an umbrella term for several types of dog believed to have descended from bull and terriers. In the United States, the term is usually considered to include the American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, American Bully, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and sometimes the American Bulldog.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_bull

          Additionally the list you provided is half-filled out by the dogs that come under the pit bull breed. It even states that many dogs fall under the pit bull specification, which is why it singles out the American pit bull terrier in order to draw a distinction to them rather than say American Bullies.

          • WamGams@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The world’s first ever police DNA program started in the UK in 2021, and it was created for dog thefts, not dog attacks.

            https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-57578701

            And seeing that there is no national database of all precinct’s police reports, you will have to go to your police department and see for yourself that they are not even cataloguing the breeds per attack.

            As for your comment that there are 5 dogs that fall under the umbrella term of pit bull, that actually helps my original point that these lists are unscientific. Chihauhas aren’t lumped together with Mexican shorthairs when the numbers are tallied, neither is any dog lumped with their types. These lists also don’t break down which of the pit types are most responsible for the most attacks.

            1. because the numbers aren’t collected by anybody, meaning the lists are lying, and
            2. if the pit types were separated by their actual breed, the numbers would show an average or a slightly higher rate of aggression, not the majority of all attacks.

            I would also point out that almost none of these lists you read online include German Shephards, which is strange since they tend to be the only dog in the US that is commissioned as Police Officer and are frequently attacking people as part of their job. Further evidence that these lists are unscientific and politically motivated.

            • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              not a single police department in the nation DNA tests.

              So you made this statement without knowing if it was true or not as you go on to say that “there is no national database of all precinct’s police reports, you will have to go to your police department and see for yourself”.

              Bad faith arguments always end with “go and find out for yourself”.

              Can I ask what do you think the word breed means? It’s not a specific dog, it’s a term to describe a grouping of dogs (Shepards for example). And out of the 300 plus recognised groupings/breeds of dog, Pitbulls kill more than all of them combined. Even if you split it down to each sub-grouping, the dogs under the umbrella term “Pit Bull” still vastly outstrip all other dogs in attacks and fatalities.

              I would also point out that almost none of these lists you read online include German Shephards, which is strange since they tend to be the only dog in the US that is commissioned as Police Officer and are frequently attacking people as part of their job. Further evidence that these lists are unscientific and politically motivated.

              In this post I provided another commenter a breakdown of fatalities caused by dogs and the graph shows German shepherds specifically cause less than 3% of fatalities over 16 years. Meanwhile the 5 dogs that make up Pit Bulls are responsible for an average of 67%.