petrescatraian@libranet.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 days agoDeepseek when asked about sensitive topicsi.postimg.ccimagemessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1313arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1313arrow-down1imageDeepseek when asked about sensitive topicsi.postimg.ccpetrescatraian@libranet.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 days agomessage-square79fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-22 days ago The text is so fuckin small… Here’s an upscaled copy that is slightly more legible without having to blow the image up first:
minus-squareWaterWaiver@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoIt looks identical to me. Same size before clicking, same size after right clicking -> Open image in new tab.
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoThe original was 474x767 pixels, I upscaled it to 1000x1618 pixels. You can check the file info on each yourself.
minus-squareburgersc12@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoCause “upscaling” the image doesn’t really work that well in a lot of cases, such as this.
The text is so fuckin small…
Here’s an upscaled copy that is slightly more legible without having to blow the image up first:
It looks identical to me. Same size before clicking, same size after right clicking -> Open image in new tab.
The original was 474x767 pixels, I upscaled it to 1000x1618 pixels. You can check the file info on each yourself.
Cause “upscaling” the image doesn’t really work that well in a lot of cases, such as this.