• bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Long term boycottes are the best thing - IF you can get large numbers to follow. Large enough that management schools are forced to teach about how ever real reform won’t be enough to save you from bad actions.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Large enough that management schools are forced to teach about how ever real reform won’t be enough to save you from bad actions.

      Sadly, in the world of multinational business, that isn’t how management schools perceive boycotts.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That means you haven’t make them large enough yet.

        Good luck getting people to care, but it is in the end your best counter.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Generally a company doing something bad enough to encourage a large enough boycott to affect the bottom line is making quite a bit of money. They calculate the loss of sales due to the boycott over time and can plot when the value of the bad business is lower than the boycott. Many times they continue with the bad behavior in spite of loss of business from the boycott because the business might be at the edge of viability anyway. So extracting the last bit of value out of the company is a net win before the rotting husk is sold off in pieces for the value of its assets or the brand is sold to the opposing group that actually likes the bad behavior that was being boycotted so it becomes an asset again.