• boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Their hardware requirements are pretty clear. Samsung is the only one with comparably secure devices, but they use nonstandard tools like Odin and lock down many security features to the stock OS only.

    Other companies are supposedly not making anything as secure.

    https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

    Also, only Google can really ship updates that quickly and fully, as Android is literally their OS. They are also a huge company, so yeah they have way more resources than a random other company you might prefer.

    Example Fairphone, which has horrible update schedules

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I am aware of the shortcomings of my choice.

      But my priority is to not give a cent to Google: what am I supposed to do then?

      I argue that GrapheneOS gives Pixel phones more value, thereby supporting Google. That is not great.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        If your priority is to not give a cent to Google then don’t use GrapheneOS. There are other degoogled OSes for people whose priority is that. If your priority is security then you’d be willing to sacrifice on avoiding anything Google by getting GrapheneOS.

        In any case, technically if you wanted to avoid anything primarily made by Google you’d have a Linux phone. The degoogled Android OSes are still based on Google’s open-source code.