El Pais paywall can be disabled via reader view in your web browser.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s exactly the wrong take.

    Provide something that isn’t what they need in order to fill a need they have.

    That’s like giving someone drugs instead to masque symptoms of working in the problem and addressing it.

    But that’s not right either. If providing sexual encounters was real and done appropriately then there this situation might still exists. If it’s the physical space and intimacy that are triggering, then a robot is a very good choice if it provides some of the missing human experiences that missing out on when desired make for more broken people

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What they need is emotional intimacy, but they can’t get that because of crippling anxiety. You’re not going to get emotional intimacy from a robot, and if you try, you run the very real risk of really adverse effects, like this or this.

      That’s why I suggested separating concerns. Keep the bot physical, and encourage real personal relationships in a low risk environment. There’s always a chance a personal relationship develops into something more, whereas there’s a lot of risk expecting a bot to fill that gap.