- cross-posted to:
- linuxphones@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- linuxphones@lemmy.ml
Since https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1gdhy7u/experimental_flathub_release_of_newpipe_on_linux/ got a bit of traction yesterday, this is WhatsApp straight from Meta running on Linux desktop using android-translation-layer.
android-translation-layer (ATL) is a Wine-like approach to run Android applications on Linux. Rather than running an Android container like for example Waydroid does this instead implements the Android API. Note that right now it’s very much work in progress and almost no app will work yet, but the fact that they have apps like Newpipe and WhatsApp running already is very promising!
Join the Matrix chat at #android-translation-layer:matrix.org and follow along!
Very cool. I’ll stick with a WhatsApp Matrix bridge so I don’t have to install a Meta app, though.
slidge-whatsapp gateway for XMPP
Nice!
Do I need to run my own instance for this, or is it possible to do this without control over my instance?
I think you need to run the service yourself
I’m curious, doesn’t WhatsApp require a phone number to be attached to an account? As in, I thought activating it doesn’t work on devices without a SIM card?
I haven’t used it in a while, but I think it just sends you an SMS with a code that you can enter manually, so yeah it works on devices without a SIM
Exactly. I created my whatsapp account in waydroid like this.
…but it can’t run both in your phone and in your computer, right? For that you need the desktop app (which is Windows only) or the web app, which linux apps encapsulate right?
You don’t need to install it on your phone, though.
I can feel it in the air. This is going to take off just like how wine and proton took off. We are going to go through another “Linux gaming” rush all over again and this shit is going to be fun. Let’s go!!!
Wine was first released in 1993. I hope our children are there to see the take off.
Didn’t it take off in the late 90’s within Linux communities?
So I’d give this a few years, then.
in the late ’90s*
Username checks out ig, but really now?
Really. Apostrophes are used for possession & contractions (not making words plural). In this case, you are omitting the 19 from the decade starting at 1990. What is plural is the years inside that decade, meaning the 10s place. All to say, it is 100% ’90s*.
I meant to say it was pedantic, and thus a bit unnecessary.
One man’s pedentry is another man’s pet peeve. This is a syntactic error that isn’t just a typo but a misunderstanding of the mechanics of apostrophes.