• SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Am I misunderstanding the article? It seemed to imply remote intrusion required either Bluetooth proximity, or physical USB access.

    • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The “attack” is from the host side, any remote attack is theoretical and would depend on exploiting the software on the host first to then gain access to the BT chip.