• NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Copyright has not, was not intended to, and does not currently, pay artists.

    Wrong in all points.

    Copyright has paid artists (though maybe not enough). Copyright was intended to do that (though maybe not that alone). Copyright does currently pay artists (maybe not in your country, I don’t know that).

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wrong in all points.

      No, actually, I’m not at all. In-fact, I’m totally right:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhBpI13dxkI

      Copyright originated create a monopoly to protect printers, not artists, to create a monopoly around a means of distribution.

      How many artists do you know? You must know a few. How many of them have received any income through copyright. I dare you, to in good faith, try and identify even one individual you personally know, engaged in creative work, who makes any meaningful amount of money through copyright.