Nemeski@lemm.ee to Programming@programming.dev · 2 months agoAI isn’t ready to replace human coders for debugging, researchers sayarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkAI isn’t ready to replace human coders for debugging, researchers sayarstechnica.comNemeski@lemm.ee to Programming@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square30linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoManual memory management is already relatively niche and not needed for most programming tasks
minus-squareJustAnotherKay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoWhile you’re not wrong, we still need to understand it at least well enough to avoid RCE and fix memory-related bugs
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoBytes is a way to store data. Its unrelated to memory management, even if its automatic.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 months agoI wouldn’t say unrelated, but anyway what’s the broad term for what you are doing when you are being concerned with how bytes are stored then? Whatever that is, there’s a generation of coders already who aren’t doing so much of it
Manual memory management is already relatively niche and not needed for most programming tasks
While you’re not wrong, we still need to understand it at least well enough to avoid RCE and fix memory-related bugs
Bytes is a way to store data. Its unrelated to memory management, even if its automatic.
I wouldn’t say unrelated, but anyway what’s the broad term for what you are doing when you are being concerned with how bytes are stored then? Whatever that is, there’s a generation of coders already who aren’t doing so much of it
Endianness.