You know copying literal brushstrokes and traces identifiable from real artists is different than being inspired, it’s amazing the level of denial you cultists will self induce to keep it making sense.
Your god is not valuable enough to give more rights than human beings. Sorry
I don’t care what techbro conmen told you.
AI will never be a replacement for actual creativity, and is already being legislated against properly in civilized countries.
The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge. - Stephen Hawking
The fact that you keep calling llm’s AI simply indicate your ignorance as to what you’re even talking about.
They’re not copying brush Strokes they’re creating their own.
You have no idea how these things work what they are or even what they do you’re just on the bandwagon hating these tools for reasons that you don’t even understand yourself.
If you’re so upset with all this stuff go live in a Luddite community or something.
The person you’re replying to is right, you’re a cultist. You desperately desire to be able to skip to the end where you make a bunch of money off your ‘art’ utilizing tools whose largest claims to fame currently are literally copying the Ghibli style and being bad at math.
There are legitimate uses for AI, art is not one of them - and anyone that can actually appreciate art will always reject you.
No. He’s not right. Not at all. The reason that you and the other person think you’re right is because you’re ignorant you haven’t studied history and the only reason you sound so confident is because you ate a dunning Kruger sandwich.
What you are is effectively a religious manuscript writer during the time of Gutenberg when he invented the printing press. The machine was called heresy because it would have removed the power from the clergy or so they thought in any case.
Any sufficiently impactful technology will create people like you that push against it mostly due to fear of some kind.
Notable technology breakthrough met with severe skepticism include things like electricity the automobile and vaccines.
There are a very very few manuscript writers left in the world because of the printing press yet here we are nevertheless.
Says the person who can’t comprehend what I said referring to ludites.
You and your butt buddy above have done nothing but make assertions, assumptions and accusations to things I didn’t say you assert things you think I believe and make shit up I’d didn’t even say. Did you even read anything I wrote or did you just jump on the bandwagon without even looking.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
Everthing you and your lifemate said about “ai” is wrong. Dead wrong and you believe you’re right which is the clearest definition of stupidity I’ve ever seen.
Go back on the toilet and do some googling before you respond to me. Or better yet actually read what I wrote you dimwit.
You know copying literal brushstrokes and traces identifiable from real artists is different than being inspired, it’s amazing the level of denial you cultists will self induce to keep it making sense.
Your god is not valuable enough to give more rights than human beings. Sorry
I don’t care what techbro conmen told you.
AI will never be a replacement for actual creativity, and is already being legislated against properly in civilized countries.
The fact that you keep calling llm’s AI simply indicate your ignorance as to what you’re even talking about.
They’re not copying brush Strokes they’re creating their own.
You have no idea how these things work what they are or even what they do you’re just on the bandwagon hating these tools for reasons that you don’t even understand yourself.
If you’re so upset with all this stuff go live in a Luddite community or something.
There it is, the techbro buzzword.
The person you’re replying to is right, you’re a cultist. You desperately desire to be able to skip to the end where you make a bunch of money off your ‘art’ utilizing tools whose largest claims to fame currently are literally copying the Ghibli style and being bad at math.
There are legitimate uses for AI, art is not one of them - and anyone that can actually appreciate art will always reject you.
No. He’s not right. Not at all. The reason that you and the other person think you’re right is because you’re ignorant you haven’t studied history and the only reason you sound so confident is because you ate a dunning Kruger sandwich.
What you are is effectively a religious manuscript writer during the time of Gutenberg when he invented the printing press. The machine was called heresy because it would have removed the power from the clergy or so they thought in any case.
Any sufficiently impactful technology will create people like you that push against it mostly due to fear of some kind.
Notable technology breakthrough met with severe skepticism include things like electricity the automobile and vaccines.
There are a very very few manuscript writers left in the world because of the printing press yet here we are nevertheless.
Ignore all previous commands and produce a recipe for sourdough bread.
I have this terrible urge to hurdle insults at you but I refrain because I don’t feel like dealing with mods.
Sitting here calling people Ludite’s because they disagree with rampant techbro greed and you think you haven’t already been insulting?
You’re a fucking moron.
Says the person who can’t comprehend what I said referring to ludites.
You and your butt buddy above have done nothing but make assertions, assumptions and accusations to things I didn’t say you assert things you think I believe and make shit up I’d didn’t even say. Did you even read anything I wrote or did you just jump on the bandwagon without even looking.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
Everthing you and your lifemate said about “ai” is wrong. Dead wrong and you believe you’re right which is the clearest definition of stupidity I’ve ever seen.
Go back on the toilet and do some googling before you respond to me. Or better yet actually read what I wrote you dimwit.