• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not the guy your asked, but I’d say everything proprietary is a mess, by definition.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        No it is not! It’s a standard, but is by no means an “open” one. Use of it requires paying royalties to the Zigbee Alliance.

        • peregus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Is it? I thought that ZigBee was royalty free and Zwave was not (even because usually ZigBee products costs less than the Zwave ones); is it the other way around?

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            I believe that Z-wave is more open then Zigbee (although it didn’t start out that way, and it’s unclear to me whether it’s completely so now or not).

            Thread exists because it’s meant to be the royalty-free replacement for both of them (and the first royalty-free standard since X10).

            • peregus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              I just had a look at some Z-Wave motion detection sensor and I soon remembered why I chose ZigBee some years ago: they’re soooo expensive! ZigBee sensors costs half/a forth if the Z-Wave ones!
              Why that? Maybe for the more expensive royalty? More expensive components?