Note that accounts on both networks must follow the main bridge account to work.

  • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    The BlueSky protocol relies on central servers tho, I’m not sure if there’s much that ActivityPub can take inspiration from

    • Twoafros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Non technical person here, I would love to hear more about how decentralized (or not decentralized) the Bluesky protocol is compared to ActivityPub

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Here is a good blogpost about it

        https://taggart-tech.com/20241124-bluesky-questions-pt1/

        Check out this mastodon thread and associated links

        https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/113504285308484716

        TL;DR Bluesky is not functionally federated nor decentralized, it is dubious if it ever will be and the layer of post sorting and moderation required to participate in Bluesky’s network is extremely computationally intensive and this aspect of Bluesky is NOT open source and is a proprietary black box.

        The fediverse and activity pub are the future, even if the current hype train leaving the station (…who is paying for all the free drinks on that train and why?) makes it feel otherwise in the short term.