It’s all made from our data, anyway, so it should be ours to use as we want

  • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Am I allowed to take a copyrighted image, decrease its size to 1x1 pixels and publish it? What about 2x2?

    It’s very much not clear when a modification violates copyright because copyright is extremely vague to begin with.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Just because something is defined legally instead of technologically, that doesn’t make it vague. The modification violates copyright when the result is a derivative work; no more, no less.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        What is a derivative work though? That’s again extremely vague and has been subject to countless lawsuits seeking to determine the bounds.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          If your work depends on the original, such that it could not exist without it, it’s derivative.

          I can easily create a pixel of any arbitrary color, so it’s sufficiently transformative that it’s considered a separate work.

          The four fair use tests are pretty reliable in making a determination.