I loved it but I read fast. William Gibson books, in general, do start off sort of disjointed then begin to turn into a story, so I’d say read this one through but if you don’t like it you probably don’t like his writing style. Also, I read it when it was new so it was quite novel at that time, sure it is a different experience at this point in time.

If you’re not into a book it is not some great personal failure to stop reading it. People put reading books on too high of a pedestal, it’s just like any other form of entertainment media and if you aren’t jiving with it you can just go do something else.

I was pretty hooked from the start. My imagination really took off with it picturing all the tech.

I also enjoy the cyberpunk genre, so I’m sure it helps.

It may also be my ADHD that the jumping around really just vibed with me.

I was basically hooked from the start. Probably just a personal preference thing, I wouldn’t worry too much about it. I still haven’t been able to read through any of The Lord of the Rings, and yet see my first sentence, lol.

Just accept that it’s wiggy at first. You’re being dragged along on a very high level heist with experienced professionals in their field, and your primary pov is a drug-addled hacker who struggles to differentiate meatspace from cyberspace. They’re not going to stop and explain anything, but you’ll understand the vibes.

If you’re still hot for it afterwards, give it another read. A lot more makes sense once you have an understanding of the bigger picture.

Too lazy to dig up the source, but I remember that Gibson said something to the effect of emulating the experience of him hanging around a group of hackers irl just listening in, not having background/context, but just allowing meaning to slowly come together as an outsider.

The worlds he built do not spoon feed anything to the observer. Even the characters often have to figure out what just happened after the fact; that’s how quickly technologies and people move there.

Second read through was even more rewarding than the first, if you have the time it will not disappoint.

I’m going to stray from the herd here and just say ‘stop’. It’s not a good book. It is foundational to cyber punk and we wouldn’t have movies like the matrix without it, but that doesn’t mean it’s good. I’ll also give it a lot of credit for being a very well imagined future with some great settings. But the main character is unrelatable, and the supporting characters are shallow. I’ll give it a pass for being a product of its time and not call out the racism and misogyny. But it commits the worst sin of a story in that you just don’t give a shit what happens to the characters. If halfway through the story a bomb went off and the story went on with a whole new cast, you’ll be ok with that. With no connection to the characters you have no investment in the victory or concern about their defeat, so the plot just kind of happens and you feel pretty ‘meh’ about it.

It’s awesome when you’re 14 and into fantasy. Not so much later in life. I reread it a few years ago because I remember loving it as a kid. I couldn’t even finish it. Maybe I’m just not as into fantasy anymore.

You’re supposed to feel disoriented. Gibson is trying to capture a sense of a future that is accellerating to the point where humans can no longer exist there as we are.

The terminology is supposed to feel bewildering. Don’t sweat it. You’ll piece things together through context.

Stick with it. It’s the kind of book that is capable of completely rewiring your brain. An absolute masterpiece.

With all that being said, maybe try reading the short story Johnny Mnemonic first? That functions as an introduction to the setting and might be a more approachable way to ease yourself into his style. Fewer characters, a smaller, more compact scenario.