![](https://pawb.social/pictrs/image/c046db43-df2a-403b-be78-b692112c970f.jpeg)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Deepseek only has censorship on their hosted site… if you run the open source model on your own hardware it doesn’t seem to censor
28F, she/her - Seattle - Drive stick, use Linux, do praxis. Don’t call me unless I gave you my number
Deepseek only has censorship on their hosted site… if you run the open source model on your own hardware it doesn’t seem to censor
Yeah, and with the added context of other things Meta has done over the past few days, we can plainly see what this is about.
It’s a great way to get facts if you want your facts to be accurate less than half of the time.
I suppose I’m just seeing how even Twitter has had success with community notes, and figured it would be the same on Facebook. But it’s easy to forget just how… out there Facebook is these days.
I don’t know what the “International Fact-Checking Network” is and I doubt most Facebook users do. The type of person using Facebook is going to likely trust notes written by their peers more than things that come from “on high” (meaning Facebook themselves)
Honestly not a bad idea. The community notes are easier to trust and typically more accurate anyway.
But being good to your neighbors and doing direct action like volunteering will make a huge difference, and you don’t need the news for that!