thank you man

THIS

Take my “emerald mine gold”

albert einstein quote about human stupidity

THEN LET ME FAKING PLAY MARIO KART WORLD WITH MY FRIENDS ON IT

deleted by creator

thank you so much, this is very helpful really

so a personal ad is all the data could be abused for? I mean meta recently just misused rights of book authors to train their AI with lots of terabytes worth of literature.

Its just a business expense, and so is I imagine personal data storage. Data sciene & full auto analysis catered to your corpo demands could be very powerful and evil in my eyes, idk I wish I could somehow be fully convinced that theres no danger, but I just am not as long as corporates see these things as business expenses and exists like nothing happened

Thanks i will look into this.

I’m new to privacy and just want to cut all data selling opportunities for big corpo, does that change or would you add to your response after knowing that? I’m pretty uneducated on the whole backend mechanics, it’s just the possibility of ill intent and the damage corporations can do with such data that frightens me

Your information seems very knowledgeable, so I will be very thankful for more guidance :p

Buying a VPN seems to be something I need to budget in one day… It’s not that easy during these times to get money flexible

on that note, no chat logins in all alternatives mentioned. at least these that also list minimizing data transfer to amazon :(

Would love to hear insights on why Mozilla with uBlock is worse than these front ends that dont specifically list minimizing communication with amazon efforts but only “no ads/open source” (i dont even know what what difference open source makes in that case)

Could it possibly work to still participate in the chats (like i imagine a throwaway account for example) or does that break the whole concept of privacy? How does that work exactly.

Thank you for your contribution!

Could it possibly work to still participate in the chats (like i imagine a build in throwaway account for example) or does that break the whole concept of privacy? How does that work exactly.

also: anyone got emotes and other browser plug-ins to work on the player/site?

Thank you for your contribution all!

doesnt mention privacy, it even lists telemetry as an anti-feature

In what way is the app more privacy-friendly?

possibly working with addons like ublock (vern cc has ad breaks) and emote support (so chat isnt a cryptic jungle)

EDIT: added more description to my interest in the EDIT of the post

but emulators are perfectly legal?

Of course I would buy the game officially

nice but these tutorials seem to be about jailbreaking consoles not emulation, or am I wrong?

yes lol. I also have a 4070ti though

EDIT: I have no clue where this could be a relevant argument

Am I the only one thinking that a huge chunk of the initial audience are Nintendo adults who already have a pc for main games and a switch on the side?

Feels like this gimmick (although every new Nintendo console gets one) was so forced just to upsell a switch 1 and justify splitting the community with exclusive releases. Really sad to see mk world not playable with a player base on switch 1. Most next gen were happily bought enough with a reasoning in increasing hardware (which the switch 2 really also does well).

Just the predatory move of splitting or even passively force the playerbase to leave behind the switch 1, makes the mouse sensor so MEH… I mean… lackluster in my eyes. Idk

I’d find it more impactful to make the science paper the main focus (the link). Not some biased Blog – which ofc can be very helpful to initially spark your interest in topics you haven’t heard yet

But we have very strong evidence of this in scientific consensus, a peer reviewed meta analysis: Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers by J. Poore, T. Nemecek et al.

(off topic: newer study on ghg bound to nutritional value of items )

Personal no paywall Upload by Poore on his website found here

And processed data visualized well on i.e. Ourworldindata

If you feel lost in any way with these sources, look for imagery figures, they often contain the resulting messages. (but without helping you understand how the results are to be weighted in relevancy due ie data collection methods and choices)

Change in reality is not a switch in a day.

It’s a long process, and so a slow decline in demand. If demand for the unethical product would be flipped with the ethical one like the opposite of what we have now, the practice would effectively be irrelevant and since it’s only alive due subsidies likely also very unprofitable – therefore ‘bought away’ unlike the title claims

It’s a demand issue. And that’s an issue because lack of education for example (at least in my eyes), education about epistemology, logic, moral and empathy

We as individuals are NOT responsible for what consequences other demands bring, this angle feels like taking the burden of the collective world onto one self. But that is not the case