It is reliable, reasonably light weight, and has connectors for a number of protocols. I’ve been running one for a couple of years now. Very low maintenance compared to other social media software I am running. Feel free to check it out, hubzilla.eskimo.com/
@jbloggs777 @LifeLemons While it’s true distributions tend to choose apparmor or selinux by default (apparmor in the case of debian derived OS’s and selinux in the case of Redhat derived OS’s), all four are actually supported by the kernel and most distros include all in their repositories it’s just that those come installed by default.
You can limit what a given package has access to with kernel based security package profiles for packages like apparmor, selinux, smack or tomoyo. Someone with root access can change this but it can be helpful at preventing someone from gaining that access in the first place.
@possiblylinux127 It strikes me as weird someone down votes a simple statement of fact. I guess they have a problem with reality.
@possiblylinux127 It is touted as a replacement for X-windows but the PRIMARY ADVANTAGE of X-windows is that you can run a program on one machine and display it on anther making Wayland completely useless in a networked context.
Wayland didn’t work out networking, even to this day, which is why I’m still using Xorg.
@TheLugal @ALostInquirer If you want an old facebook look, take a look at friendica. friendica.eskimo.com/