The article did not describe either of those things that way. Cynicism is overriding reading comprehension.

The article starts by doing the “quantum” thing that really irks me

Basically, they found a way to send quantum entangled photons

Making things requires a process‽ Can’t explain that!

Removed by mod

I encourage you to produce something no one buys forever.

You haven’t shown why you think it does. Or any understanding at all. But that’s not your goal anyway.

And I’m sure that you don’t.

It does not. But I’m sure that’s fun for you.

Supply is very much capable of not meeting demand. It happens often.

This proves you don’t understand. Thank you.

Removed by mod

You’re almost there. Baby steps.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

You did not. But thanks for playing.

So, where are the warehouses full of unsold eggs that are constantly filling up waiting for your point to land?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

You have changed the argument from: demand decreasing does not reduce supply. To: we can’t reduce demand. Do you see the flaws in your argument yet?

So you don’t think milk will be produced without the demand to support it. Tight. We’re in agreement. Salut.