snooggums

10 million comments by 40k or so active daily users seems incredibly high.

Nope, you need to use the power to fix the timeline!

This is usps, not ups, but everything else is accurate.

Always check the real site without using a link to get there.

I am thinking it is probably comments and not posts as well.

Turkey day travel and spending time with family by prolific posters is likely.

What about those things they have for sucking the snot out of congested baby noses?

I imagine they would work on anyone as long as the top is wide enough for the nostril.

Depends on the context.

Someone in a romantic relationship? Emotional wreck, even if they just said it out of anger.

A trusted friend? Most likely take some time to think about my personal choices.

Some random person I’ve never met, or who I dislike? Wouldn’t care one bit unless they gave a reason why and they were right.

Who said it was a random person?

A better option would be gold or silver.

Figure out what was needed to be able to use large amounts of gold at the time without suspicion to avoid the printed moey issue.

That account is following part of the rules that are being enforced.

Yes, it is breaking the part about not having the name be clearly labeled but my guess is that they are going to let the ones with a clear bio explanation be last on the list to crack down on. Nitpicking whether the account is clearly labeled is extremely vague and they are going to have fun trying to sort out what that actually means.

What do they expect a parody account name to look like?

That account is following part of the rules that are being enforced.

Bluesky stated, “Parody, satire, or fan accounts are allowed on Bluesky, but they must clearly label themselves in both the display name and bio to help others know the account isn’t official.”

Perhaps what’s why Google and Ms are so excited about AI, it fixes their shitty search results.

Google used to be fantastic for doing the same kinds of searches that AI is mediocre at now, and it went to crap because of search engine optimization and their AI search isn’t any better. Even if AI eventually improves for searching, search AI optimization will end up trashing that as well.

All conservative accounts should be labeled as a parody of reality.

They’re not saying who is it isn’t trans to gatekeep, they’re presenting the idea that some people might be less confused and make different life choices if more people tolerated traditionally-gendered subjects (like clothing and makeup) from anyone without judgement

When an identity seems to be defined by appearance/presentation to those who don’t understand it personally, assuming the identity would occur less frequently if social norms were less restrictive does make sense. Like personally I don’t think drag would be a thing if it wasn’t a bit of a response to gender norms. I mean even if society didn’t care about which gender wears which clothes some guys would get dolled up and even do essentially the same performative thing because some people just love to perform, but it wouldn’t be the same thing that drag is now and it wouldn’t be controversial to bigots. I mean women wearing pants was a huge fucking deal for no real reason and nobody really cares anymore.

But using clothing choices as a reason someone might be trans misses the point that a lot of trans people wore jeans and t shirts before and after transitioning because there is far more to it than the superficial appearance of clothing choice.

That song sounds like what AI would spit out if it was told to make a song that sounds like an anime intro that includes every fucking cliche from a superhero team up.

Yes, the song gets even worse as it goes on.

Their search algorithm was great.

They put up signs that the scan will be deleted after verification, but I am guessing that is a misdirection and a hash of the scan is saved like how fingerprint scanners work. Otherwise there would be no need for the scanners since a person is there to verify the scan already…

But, perhaps the difference is generational. I haven’t spoken to very many people about this, but what I have noticed is a shift over time from menus to feeds on the internet. Forums are dying. Users don’t want to scroll search results, they want an AI to just give them the answer. And the difference seems to be generational. Perhaps informed by our early experiences with online platforms. It certainly cannot be an absolute distinction, but a correlation seems evident from the state of the world.

Extrapolates a distinction between number of questions and answer based on age from a tiny data set, acknowleeges large scale changes over time that applies to all ages, offhandedly mentions the actual reason (early experiences with the internet), then goes back to random speculation.

What a terribly incoherent article. Capitalizing ‘Mine’ made it a struggle. Why didn’t they capitalize ‘ours’ for consistency? If I was tha author I would assume it was because of generational self centeredness or something, because everything needs to be generational conflict!

Comment ratio is not an indication of whether someone is online, just whether they feel the need to comment a lot. I tend to spend the same amount of time reading whether I’m commenting or not.

Lurkers can be terminally online.