- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
Capitalists the moment the free market™️ no longer works for them: “I love state intervention!”
The USA wants a world where AI wants is given permission to consume all copyrighted content for free, but we are charged for access to scholarly papers.
AI models trained on public information should be open sourced and publicly available.
Billionaire’s should not own this behind closed doors.
Good luck with that. DeepSeek has already been reverse engineered.
Isn’t DeepSeek open source? Is there a need to reverse engineer it?
“Open source” in ML is a really bad description for what it is. “Free binary with a bit of metadata” would be more accurate. The code used to create deepseek is not open source, nor is the training datasets. 99% of “open source” models are this way. The only interesting part of the open sourcing is the architecture used to run the models, as it lends a lot of insight into the training process, and allows for derivatives via post-training
Deepseek actually released a bunch of their infrastructure code, including the infamous tricks for making training and interference more efficient, a couple of weeks ago.
