Its a space of 1meter×1meterx1meter, basically a cubic meter where the matter replicator works on. (So, no replicating cars, since its too big)

How do you min-max this?

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Have the replicator print a replicator that auto-prints identical copies of itself as often as it can so you can cause the collapse of reality without having to be involved.

      Hell, have the replicator print a replicator without the 24-hour cooldown to hurry things along a little

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    I suspect a lot of guns, explosives, body armor and anti-armor munitions due to the immediate civil war that would break out in most countries as the wealthy elite tells the government to confiscate everyones matter replicators.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    First I’m gonna move out of my apartment since there will sure be plenty of geniuses who’s gonna produce 1 cubic meter of solid gold, and the building might not be happy about 20-ton blocks appearing out of thin air.

  • Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    You mean after gold and diamonds essentially become worthless? A lot of people would definitely use it for medications.

    • Noodle07@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Me getting a cubic meter of each ADHD drugs see if any works better than mine… Except on sunday, I get my weekly supply of coca cola

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I was busy thinking about that. Why not make a replicator without limits if possible? No downsides because then you’d be able to create what you want when you want. Anyone dumb enough not to think of that would be stuck using it once a day while you are able to create all you want.

    • TeamBrett@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Wouldn’t you need two replicators? One to be replicated and one to do the replicating? And if the replicator itself is a box (assumption since it was not specifies) the replicator would have to be larger than the max size.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Obviously everybody now has high end computers, cameras, a variety of lenses, phones, etc. Foldable Ebikes like the aipas would fit in the space.

    1 meter solar panels are a hit but since most batteries and capacitors require materials difficult to handle it becomes highly demanded.

    Every political building now has thick blastproof exteriors as making bombs has never been easier, judges live in the courthouse now.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Let’s be honest, it’ll be nothing but dildos and fleshlights for the first year and a half. We’ll be swimming in life-like toy dicks before anyone realizes we can do anything else with it.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Life-like? Do you realize how long of a tentacle you could coil into a cubic meter? It’d be like that tool assisted perfect game of Snake, but in 3 dimensions…

  • binary45@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’d say that society as we know it would collapse fairly quickly, with it being replaced by a communist or socialist system fairly quickly. Fields that require brains would be in significant demand, as food would become a non issue. Same thing would occur with other essentials, such as food and medicine. As mentioned in other comments, money would become worthless. And there would be people who would make new replicators who would have reverse engineered their replicators.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t think it would.

      First, you’d have to power the device, which is likely going to take a lot of energy.

      Second, the device is additive only, so it can’t address issues with built in scarcity like land.

      Third, there is going to be an interesting middle ground where you still need some forms of manufacturing to run the economy.

      There will be drastic changes to the economy, but I doubt that communism would fully take over.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Make something that’ll EMP everyone’s replicators before people start replicating nukes.

    Yes the Max is the current status quo, but given the Min is almost certainly the destruction of the world, so status quo is probably the best we can hope for.

    And maybe I’d make a sandwich if there’s room for it along with the EMP.

  • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    It only takes one person to make 1 cubic meter of black hole to destroy the biosphere by ripping Earth into an acretion disc.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I like the concept of destroying the biosphere by shredding the entire fucking planet, lol.

      Using a calculator I referenced further down in the thread, a back hole with a 0.5m radius so that the event horizon would fit within the cubic meter would have a mass of over 56 earths. We’d be proper fucked!

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      So you would have to replicate a percent of the mass of the sun. Seems feasible. The electricity bill would be nuts, but the world is ending anyway.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Ah, i thought it was a hole in space or something like that, so the absence of anything, and even space was something, but not matter specifically.

          • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            It is worthwhile to note that the above is highly reductive. A “black hole” is the sort of “hole” in spacetime you’re thinking of. It is caused, however, by gravitational dilation of spacetime by an incredibly high energy density. If you stuff enough matter and energy into a tiny enough space, the gravitational force will be strong enough that no other force in the universe can keep it from getting closer, and closer. Even the forces which keep neutrons and protons from combining with each other will be surmounted, as the energy density increases asymptotically toward infinity. This tiny point of effectively infinite density is the black hole’s “singularity”. Surrounding this singularity is a region where anything (matter, light, space itself) that gets within that range cannot escape. This is because objects have escape velocities based on their masses. If you’re going fast enough, you’ll fly away from the earth never to return. If you’re not going that fast, eventually you’ll fall back down. The further you are from the earth, the easier it is to escape it. The “black” part of the black hole, called the “event horizon”, is the distance from the singularity at which the black hole’s escape velocity is equal to the speed of light, meaning that, closer than that, nothing can escape it. Hence why it’s “black”, because no light is escaping from it. Technically, a black hole is not perfectly black due to hawking radiation, and a black hole with a 0.5 meter schwarzchild radius would probably be small enough to visibly glow (just a bit). (probably not, see below)

            • Zink@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              According to a random black hole calculator I found, a black hole with a 0.5m radius would be over 56 earth masses and the temperature would only be 0.000364 K. So, still orders of magnitude less than the cosmic microwave background.

              I know smaller black holes evaporate faster, but even that little thing (according to the calculator) would have a lifetime of a gargantuan multiple of the age of the universe. Like roughly a number followed by 45 zeros, times the age of the universe.

              The calculator: https://www.vttoth.com/CMS/physics-notes/311-hawking-radiation-calculator

              • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Thank you! I didn’t feel like checking with the difference in masses, and based my assumption on Stephen Hawking’s statement that an earth-mass black hole (with an event horizon the size of a pea) would glow from Into The Universe: The Story of Everything. It seems he exaggerated, assuming this calculator is accurate and my understanding of its values is fair. Such an exaggeration is disappointing, if not entirely surprising.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        A cubic meter of the core of a neutron star would still count as matter. While it probably wouldn’t literally destroy the Earth, I wouldn’t want to be on the same…continent…when that thing went off.